There are a number of things wrong with this article. The first issue that I can see is the wrong root form ins, it is anasa (to be friendly or to sense), NOT nasiya. The fact that this author is self-taught speaks volumes in the inefficiences of his works. He obviously has a slant that he wants to stick into the Quran. If I were you I would take his work with a HUGE grain of salt, especially everything having to do with Yogic practices and Sanskrit. Why are you just blindly posting this guys stuff without being able to defend them. You are spreading his teachings without understanding them. Why?